10 Useful Agentic AI Security Templates for Managing AI Agent Risk
Agentic AI security templates provide structured frameworks for managing the unique risks of AI agents, helping organizations standardize governance, access control, and risk assessment across the AI lifecycle.
Agents are riskier than standard AI systems because they can independently travel laterally throughout systems. Agent solutions need extra guardrails, access control, and monitoring to remain secure.
AI security templates support consistency in governance, allow you to spend less time implementing, and ensure enterprise-wide risk is managed during the AI lifecycle.
Agentic AI tools can do anything from responding to customer emails to booking flights. These agents have the potential to save tons of time and energy. However, without proper safeguards in place, bad actors can abuse their elevated access. For that reason, creating standardized security policies for your AI agents is crucial.
However, most organizations don’t have any documented process for agentic risks. Instead of building your process from scratch, use a time-saving agentic AI security template. Find out why these templates are necessary, plus 10 templates to supercharge your own agent security workflows.
How Do You Use Agentic AI Security Templates?
An agentic AI security template provides a blueprint for evaluating and hardening agentic tools. Agentic AI tools operate on your behalf, which means you need additional guardrails around them versus standard chatbots.
Built in-house or obtained from an outside source, you can use agentic AI security templates to standardize:
Rather than building your procedures from ground zero, templates allow organizations to normalize how they document controls and determine risks across the AI lifecycle.
10 Agentic AI Security Templates for Streamlining Security
Agentic AI governance has to cover a lot of areas. While your organization should still customize policies for your AI agents, these ten templates can help you move faster while still covering core security requirements.
This free agentic AI security template covers high-level NIST AI RMF requirements and technical controls for everything from access management to sandboxing. Some sections are sparse on detail, so your team will still need to add information to make the template actionable for your business.
Notable features:
Defines roles and responsibilities
Includes a section for policy review
Details both technical controls and mitigation steps
Every organization needs an AI usage policy, but it’s especially important if your employees have access to agentic AI. This template’s policies only permit AI as a supplement and not a replacement for human work; if you’ve replaced human effort with AI, you may need to update this section.
Notable features:
Available as a Word file
Requires employees to assess risk while using AI
Specifies prohibited uses, like for personal use outside of work
Agentic AI tools have privileged access that other types of AI tools don’t. This agentic AI security template from SANS provides a framework for auditing high-access accounts.
Notable features:
Available in a PDF or Word file
Lists safeguards with identification codes
Specifies consequences for not following the policy
Jasper provides a free AI policy template that you can customize for your organization. It’s a broad AI strategy document rather than one that focuses specifically on agentic AI, but it can still provide guidance if you don’t have a policy yet.
Notable features:
Includes section on employee training
Provides guidance on reducing inaccuracies and bias
Are you aware of every department in your company that uses agentic AI? What about the unique risk profiles posed by agentic systems in each line of business? The Responsible AI Institute’s free checklist can help your team assess your current controls and start building consensus between legal and tech teams.
Notable features:
Helps your team identify where agentic AI is being used
Clarifies agentic AI ownership and accountability
Helps you classify your agentic systems based on risk
Even if your agentic tool is secure, what about the third-party applications it connects to? Third-party vendors are inherently risky, but especially so with agentic AI. Use this third-party security template to screen your vendors prior to connecting with their systems.
Notable features:
Provides a standardized vendor risk assessment template
Includes vetting guidelines for assessing and onboarding vendors
PurpleSec has another great vendor screening template for evaluating the third-party platforms your agentic tools will touch. The template is an AI governance framework focused on documenting configurations and data dependencies, including security requirements vendors will be held to.
Notable features:
Aligned with the EU AI Act as well as NIST
Includes vendor assessment criteria based on SOC 2 and ISO 27001 standards
Does your system know the difference between a human user and a bot? Agentic tools likely fall under your current identity management policy, but this template will help you manage all digital identities on your systems.
Notable features:
Includes best practices for verifying identities
Includes tips for multi-factor authentication and role-based access
Coverage includes centralizing SSO and inventorying approved accounts
Access is everything with agentic AI tools. Having an access management policy in place standardizes agentic access across your organization. The most secure approach is to grant agents the minimum level of access they need to do their jobs effectively.
Notable features:
Aligns access with your security and compliance requirements
Provides best practices for verification and access reviews
Enforces least privilege and continuous monitoring
Red teaming exercises mimic adversarial attacks to pinpoint weaknesses. This security exercise is especially useful for agentic AI, which is prone to more sophisticated attacks.
Notable features:
Classifies attack scenarios
Provides a framework for defining success metrics
Includes a section for documenting remediation
Mindgard Brings Real-World Testing to AI Governance
Agentic AI empowers software to do more. It also empowers attackers to do more. Agentic AI security templates provide frameworks to get started, but they don’t actually test your systems to see how they’ll perform when under attack. To bridge the gap between policy and protection, you need continuous validation of your AI systems’ behavior when attacked.
The Mindgard Platform delivers just that. Automated attacker-aligned testing processes work against your AI systems 24/7 to continuously validate how your systems will perform when under real-world attack. From prompt injection to data exfiltration to agent misuse, Mindgard tests your systems with the same attacks that real-world attackers will use to find gaps that would be invisible to any static review process.
Mindgard doesn’t just periodically audit your systems or take snapshot reviews. The Mindgard Platform integrates with your existing pipelines to help you automate red teaming, runtime detection, and continuous risk measurement throughout your entire AI development and deployment lifecycle. Schedule a demo today and see how Mindgard can help you prove that your controls work against real-world attacks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do you need tighter security around agentic AI than traditional AI tools?
Generative AI can write memos and design blueprints with proprietary information, but agents can read, retrieve, call tools, launch workflows, or automate decisions with limited oversight. Agents can do much more than create.
How will you know if your AI agent has too many permissions?
If the agent doesn’t need every permission to do its job, it almost certainly has too many. Ask yourself if the agent can read from sensitive systems, write or edit records, send messages to external users, or perform unrelated functions. Auditing access can also expose these problems.
What scenarios should you prepare for in your agentic AI response plan?
Breaches are crucial, but you should also define unauthorized behavior, overly permissive access, malicious outputs, misuse of integrated tools, vendor malicious behavior, and failures of human oversight.