Securing LLMs and GenAI applications requires specialized tools like Mindgard that offer capabilities such as red teaming, federated learning, and real-time monitoring to address AI-specific threats.
Fergal Glynn
Autonomous AI agents can perform a wide range of tasks, from booking vacations to executing financial transactions. They reduce manual effort and reduce errors, but unfortunately, novel threats can compromise AI agents. Since these agents have more access than other types of AI, they can cause significant harm in the wrong hands.
That’s why organizations need solid AI threat intelligence strategies and tools in their corner. Discover the emerging threats that harm AI agents the most and how AI threat intelligence solutions can help you prevent and respond to them in record time.
AI agents are desirable targets because they’re at the intersection of three critical elements: access, autonomy, and trust.
Agents are valuable precisely because they’re so useful for productivity. Attackers know it, too. That means securing agents is essential for protecting critical business operations.
With that context in mind, let’s examine the emerging threats that exploit these points of access, autonomy, and trust.
AI agents are high-value targets, and attackers have developed sophisticated methods for manipulating these systems in ways that traditional security tools cannot detect. Plan for these emerging risks with AI threat intelligence designed to catch hidden vulnerabilities.
With memory poisoning, an attacker feeds the AI agent false or malicious information. The issue is that the agent stores this information in its long-term memory and treats it as truth.
Unlike prompt injections that only affect a single interaction, memory poisoning embeds itself in the agent’s knowledge base, quietly influencing future decisions. Over time, these planted “memories” can subtly reshape the agent’s behavior. For example, an AI agent might mistakenly consider fraudulent vendors to be trusted partners.
Counter this threat with Mindgard’s Offensive Security solution. The Mindgard platform simulates adversarial attacks against your model, providing insight into how it handles memory poisoning attempts before release.
Model extraction happens when an attacker repeatedly queries an AI agent to reverse-engineer its model. This type of attack leaks intellectual property, allowing potential competitors to steal the time and money you invested in building this model.
Mindgard’s Offensive Security solution helps organizations defend against model extraction by safely simulating these attacks in a controlled environment. You can also stay on top of model extraction attempts by automating incident response, throttling suspicious access patterns, and watermarking your outputs.
Identity spoofing uses AI to create convincing fake identities to impersonate trusted agents, users, or systems. These synthetic personas can gain unauthorized access, commit fraud, or manipulate internal processes while appearing legitimate.
Because these attacks are AI-driven, they can personalize communications, making them far more likely to trick human users than traditional phishing methods.
Training your team will go a long way toward preventing spoofing, but even then, convincing mimics can still occur. Stay on guard by mapping identity attack surfaces, testing for unexpected authorization bypasses, and training detection systems on the newest spoofing tactics so they can spot impostors.
Multi-agent collusion is an advanced attack in which multiple compromised AI agents collaborate. Instead of a single rogue agent, several agents collude to coordinate attacks from multiple angles, causing more damage that’s harder to detect.
By working together, these agents can escalate privileges, bypass oversight mechanisms, and create exploits that evade monitoring and detection tools. The result can be cascading system failures that traditional defenses may miss until it’s too late.
Mindgard helps organizations stay ahead of this emerging threat by simulating multi-agent attacks in a safe environment. With regular training, you can help your system detect anomalies before they cause widespread damage.
AI agents can’t be protected by static controls. Attackers change tactics daily, and agents are too dynamic to defend against solely based on the perimeter. Threat intelligence provides context and foresight for defense.
These capabilities enable organizations to transform threat intelligence into a protective shield, identifying AI agent-specific risks and providing defenders with real-time insights to take action.
Defending AI agents requires more than point solutions. We recommend a layered approach to reduce risk and improve resilience. Use the following checklist to help you ground your approach:
This combination of practices reduces exposure and gives security teams the best chance to prevent, detect, and contain attacks before they can escalate.
AI agents have extensive access, making them a prime target for innovative attacks. Emerging threats compromise AI integrity and can cause cascading system failures if left unchecked.
Stay ahead of these threats with proactive AI threat intelligence. By simulating real-world adversarial attacks, monitoring agent behavior for subtle anomalies, and hardening systems before attackers strike, you can ensure AI works for you, not against you.
Mindgard’s Offensive Security solution helps you do just that. Test for threats in a safe environment, train detection systems on the latest attacks, and empower your team to act fast. Protect your AI from within: Book your Mindgard demo now.
The most damaging threats for AI agents are:
The warning signs are subtle at first. An agent may be the victim of memory poisoning if it:
AI threat intelligence combines simulated attacks, behavioral monitoring, and real-time anomaly detection to anticipate and prevent threats. Mindgard’s Offensive Security platform conducts controlled adversarial tests, maps AI-specific attack surfaces, and provides risk-scored findings, enabling security teams to refine detection rules and prioritize fixes with the necessary context.