Discover the critical importance of defending AI models against adversarial attacks in the cybersecurity landscape. Learn about six key attack categories and their consequences in this insightful article.
Fergal Glynn
Organizations need a range of expertise to withstand increasingly common and advanced adversarial attacks. To do so, businesses must adopt proactive and innovative strategies to test and strengthen their defenses—and that’s where red and purple teams come into play.
There are countless specialties within cyber security, all with individual talents and specializations. Red teams and purple teams play pivotal roles in the red teaming process, but they have different responsibilities and goals.
Red teams focus on offensive tactics, simulating real-world attacks to expose vulnerabilities, while purple teams bridge the gap between offense and defense, fostering collaboration to improve security.
Learn about the key responsibilities and differences between red teams vs purple teams and how they work together to build a stronger, more resilient approach to cyber security.
Red teaming is an increasingly popular strategy that allows organizations to get ahead of real-world attackers. The red team is a group of ethical hackers specializing in simulating real-world cyber attacks against the organization. These teams adopt the mindset of real cybercriminals, who often use creative and out-of-the-box strategies to gain unauthorized access.
The red team’s goal is to uncover vulnerabilities and test how well the organization fights against adversarial attacks. Their key responsibilities include:
Red teams focus exclusively on playing offense, while blue teams play defense. Purple teams combine offensive and defensive strategies to make red teaming a collaborative process. The goal is to remove barriers between the red and blue teams so organizations can mitigate as many vulnerabilities as possible.
While some of their responsibilities can overlap with the red team, many purple teams have responsibilities such as:
Red and purple teams have some overlap in responsibilities, but they aren’t quite the same. They differ in a few key areas:
The red team operates independently, while the purple team works collaboratively with both red and blue teams. Red teams are solely interested in going on the offensive to simulate real-world attacks, while the purple team brings the red and blue teams together to improve security.
Organizations rely on red team members to act like adversaries and identify their systems’ weak points. Some purple team members know how to act like an adversary, but they tend to focus more on implementing the red team’s suggestions.
Since the purple team also understands the red team, they can translate technical terms for other stakeholders and hold the organization accountable for implementing the red team’s suggestions.
The red team produces a report listing all the exploits they found, including recommendations for fixing these weaknesses. The purple team takes the red team’s report a step further by developing an actionable plan to improve organizational defenses.
Ultimately, red and purple teams have different goals. The red team tests how vulnerable the organization is to attacks, while the purple team thinks like a strategist to strengthen security holistically.
Not all organizations have purple teams during the red teaming process, but they can add a helpful layer of accountability and clarity, especially for large red teaming exercises.
Generative AI systems, including large language models (LLMs) and image-generation AI, are susceptible to vulnerabilities like prompt injection attacks, model poisoning, and data leakage. Red teams apply offensive security tactics to identify these weaknesses before malicious actors can exploit them. Their key responsibilities in securing AI platforms include:
With these tactics, red teams help organizations pinpoint vulnerabilities and develop defenses before real attackers strike.
Given the scale and complexity of generative AI systems, manual red teaming alone is not enough. Many organizations now integrate continuous automated red teaming (CART) tools to conduct ongoing security evaluations.
Unlike traditional red teaming, which is periodic, CART tools continuously monitor and attack AI models, uncovering vulnerabilities as they emerge. CART platforms generate dynamic attack vectors, testing AI models against ever-evolving adversarial tactics, including new forms of prompt injection and model exploitation.
Integrating CART and other red teaming tools into security operations enables organizations to immediately respond to identified vulnerabilities, ensuring real-time threat mitigation.
While red teams focus on offensive security, purple teams integrate their findings into a broader security strategy. Since AI security is an evolving field, organizations need a collaborative approach to implement continuous improvements. Purple teams support generative AI security by:
Red and purple teams work together to strengthen an organization’s cyber security posture. While red teams focus on identifying vulnerabilities by simulating real-world attacks, purple teams foster collaboration between offensive and defensive efforts.
Organizations can build a robust and proactive defense against ever-evolving cyber threats by understanding these teams’ differences and leveraging their unique strengths.
Elevate your cyber security strategy with Mindgard. Our advanced AI-driven tools and expert guidance empower businesses to detect vulnerabilities, strengthen defenses, and achieve cyber resilience. Schedule a quick demo today to see Mindgard in action.
Absolutely. Red and purple teams have complementary skills. While the red team focuses on uncovering vulnerabilities through simulated attacks, the purple team communicates and applies the red team’s suggested defensive measures.
Having both teams fosters a well-rounded security posture in organizations with mature security programs.
Purple teams use continuous monitoring, regular testing, and iterative feedback loops to ensure their organizations sustain improvements. They work closely with both red and blue teams to validate that defenses are still effective, especially as new threats emerge.
The purple team also documents lessons learned after every red team exercise, implementing updated policies and procedures as they go.
Red teams are ethical hackers by nature. While they think like adversaries, they have the organization’s best interests in mind. Still, it’s good for organizations to have rules of engagement (RoE) in place to ensure that the red team’s attacks don’t hurt the business.
The red team needs clear boundaries and permissions, not to mention controlled testing environments. These measures ensure the red team doesn’t compromise sensitive data or interrupt operations.
When it comes to red team vs blue team vs purple team, red teams simulate real-world attacks to uncover weaknesses. Blue teams protect systems, detect breaches, and respond to incidents. Purple teams foster collaboration between red and blue, ensuring discovered vulnerabilities are quickly addressed and defenses are continuously improved.